Lithuania vs Japan

Compare PPP-adjusted average wages, long-term wage trends and consumer price levels using consistent OECD data.

Country A

Country B

Wage data: 2025 · Price data: 2024

Comparison Overview

Lithuania

Average wage (2025)

$58,112

1-year change: +5.9%
5-year change: +15.9%

Overall price level (2024)

51.3 (United States = 100)

Lithuania's latest PPP-adjusted average wage is approximately 15.8% higher than Japan's.

Japan

Average wage (2025)

$50,183

1-year change: −0.5%
5-year change: −2.2%

Overall price level (2024)

59.2 (United States = 100)

Lithuania has the higher latest average wage of the two, by 15.8% on a PPP-adjusted basis. Over five years Lithuania shows the stronger change (+15.9% against −2.2%). Overall consumer prices are higher in Japan, at 59.2 against 51.3 on the United States = 100 scale — a gap of +7.9 index points. Both wage figures are for 2025 and the price levels for 2024, so the two economies are read at the same point in each series.

Wage History

See how PPP-adjusted average annual wages have changed in both economies.

PPP-adjusted annual wage (USD)

LithuaniaJapan

USD PPP, constant 2025 prices

Wage Key Facts

Metric	Lithuania	Japan
Latest wage	$58,112	$50,183
Latest year	2025	2025
1-year change	+5.9%	−0.5%
5-year change	+15.9%	−2.2%
10-year change	+55.3%	−1.6%
Historical peak	$58,112	$52,662
Peak year	2025	1997
Change from peak	0.0%	−4.7%

How the Wage Trends Compare

Current Position

Lithuania records the higher figure: $58,112 against $50,183, a gap of 15.8%. The gap is clear enough to rank the two, though it says nothing about how the figure is distributed within either economy.

Both figures are for 2025, so this is a like-for-like comparison of the same year rather than of two different latest points.

Both use the same basis: PPP-adjusted US dollars at constant prices. That conversion strips out the price level differences between the two economies, which is what makes the two figures comparable at all — neither is a local-currency salary, and neither is what an employer in that country would write on a contract.

Recent Momentum

Lithuania had the stronger latest year (+5.9% against −0.5%).

Japan was the one that fell, while Lithuania rose, so the latest year moved them apart rather than together.

Widening the window to five years, the stronger of the two is Lithuania: +15.9% against −2.2%.

For both economies the latest year points the same way as the five-year change, so the recent movement reads as continuation rather than a turn.

Long-Term Direction

The ten-year direction splits between them: +55.3% for Lithuania against −1.6% for Japan. One long-term series is rising while the other is not, which is a more durable difference than any single year's movement.

Lithuania is at its historical peak in the latest year, while Japan sits 4.7% from its high of 1997. One has recovered its previous ground and the other has not.

The gap has been widening rather than closing over the five-year window: the economy that already reported the higher wage is also the one growing faster.

Consumer Price Level Comparison

Compare eight consumer price categories with the United States benchmark of 100.

United States = 100
Missing values are shown as -

All differences are shown in index points. United States = 100.

Category	Lithuania	Japan	Difference (LTU − JPN)	LTU vs U.S.	JPN vs U.S.
Overall	51.3	59.2	−7.9	−48.7	−40.8
Food	87.2	112	−24.8	−12.8	+12.0
Clothing	94.9	71	+23.9	−5.1	−29.0
Housing	33.3	48.5	−15.2	−66.7	−51.5
Health	30.7	33.9	−3.2	−69.3	−66.1
Transport	84.4	84.4	0.0	−15.6	−15.6
Recreation	61.8	78.4	−16.6	−38.2	−21.6
Restaurants & Accommodation	70.2	72.6	−2.4	−29.8	−27.4

Overall
Lithuania51.3
Japan59.2
Difference−7.9
LTU vs U.S.−48.7
JPN vs U.S.−40.8
Food
Lithuania87.2
Japan112
Difference−24.8
LTU vs U.S.−12.8
JPN vs U.S.+12.0
Clothing
Lithuania94.9
Japan71
Difference+23.9
LTU vs U.S.−5.1
JPN vs U.S.−29.0
Housing
Lithuania33.3
Japan48.5
Difference−15.2
LTU vs U.S.−66.7
JPN vs U.S.−51.5
Health
Lithuania30.7
Japan33.9
Difference−3.2
LTU vs U.S.−69.3
JPN vs U.S.−66.1
Transport
Lithuania84.4
Japan84.4
Difference0.0
LTU vs U.S.−15.6
JPN vs U.S.−15.6
Recreation
Lithuania61.8
Japan78.4
Difference−16.6
LTU vs U.S.−38.2
JPN vs U.S.−21.6
Restaurants & Accommodation
Lithuania70.2
Japan72.6
Difference−2.4
LTU vs U.S.−29.8
JPN vs U.S.−27.4

Lithuania and Japan in Detail

Current Wage Position

Lithuania reports a PPP-adjusted average annual wage of $58,112 for 2025, and Japan $50,183 for 2025. That puts Lithuania ahead by 15.8%.

Both figures are PPP-adjusted: converted using purchasing power parities rather than market exchange rates, and expressed in constant prices so different years stay comparable.

This matters for reading the gap. A market-rate conversion would move with currency markets and would not reflect what the money buys in each economy. These figures are built to compare purchasing power, not to tell you what a currency transfer would be worth.

Recent Wage Momentum

In the latest reported year Lithuania changed by +5.9% and Japan by −0.5%. A single year is a narrow window, so it is worth reading alongside the five-year figure rather than on its own.

Over five years, Lithuania records the larger change at +15.9%, against −2.2% for Japan. That is the difference in how far each series has travelled over the medium term, in real PPP-adjusted terms.

Short-term and five-year movement point the same way for both economies, so neither is currently being pulled against its own medium-term direction.

Long-Term Wage Direction

Across ten years the changes are +55.3% for Lithuania and −1.6% for Japan. This is the longest horizon the data covers, and it is the one least affected by any single year's movement.

Lithuania reached its highest recorded value of $58,112 in 2025, and the latest figure sits 0.0% from that high.

Japan peaked at $52,662 in 1997, leaving its latest value 4.7% away from that point.

Over the long run the two point in opposite directions. That is the clearest structural difference between these series, and it matters more for reading them than any single year's change does.

Consumer Price Profile

Against the United States benchmark of 100, overall consumption sits at 51.3 in Lithuania and 59.2 in Japan — −7.9 index points apart.

The categories that separate them most are Food (−24.8) and Clothing (+23.9).

Transport is where they are nearest, at 84.4 and 84.4.

Across the categories with data, Japan is the more expensive of the two more often than not.

How to Interpret the Comparison

These are average wages, not median wages, and not take-home pay. An average is pulled by the whole distribution, so it does not describe a typical individual, occupation, city or employer in either economy.

The wage figures are already PPP-adjusted and in constant prices. They are not local-currency salaries and not amounts convertible at a market exchange rate.

The price levels are relative indices against United States = 100. They describe how price levels compare, not what a household actually spends.

Wages and price levels should not be combined into a verdict on which country is better. This page is for understanding how the two wage trends and price structures differ — nothing further follows from it.